
|
1.
|
We have worked with mainstream (“general needs”) housing services, to identify fruitful areas for improved communication, co-
|
|
2.
|
We have worked with local mental health services, to help develop a local mental health accommodation needs analysis, and from this, a whole person, whole systems mental health accommodation strategy.
|
|
3.
|
We have worked with the new developing services for individuals with personality disorder -
|
|
4.
|
We have worked with the National Social Inclusion Programme of NIMHE/CSIP and a variety of research agencies to identify an achievable research agenda, to develop the evidence base for new policy and practice developments in mental health and housing at local, regional and national level.
|
|
5.
|
We have worked with the Royal College of Psychiatrists and others in the Community of Communities on a project to define and evaluate “enabling environments”, including the kind of “psychologically informed environments that the
|

An article on “At Home”, published in Mental Health Today, has a useful summary of key findings for a frontline readership. See exec summary and key messages on this site for a still briefer account.
A further article with an update on the implications of the “At Home?” findings in
the light of the new local government framework; a free-
An extended article from the special edition of “Housing with Care and Support” explains in detail the practical implications for frontline services.
A subsequent article in the publications section explains the continuing need for, and wider potential in, gathering data on service users’ housing needs and circumstances.
This culminated in the issuing of new guidance on meeting the psychological and emotional needs of homeless people, (See: Policy & Guidance; also several articles on personality disorder and “complex trauma” in the Publications and Thinkpieces & reviews sections)
For NSIP we produced a comprehensive knowledge review, an analysis of existing datasets for social inclusion outcomes in housing, and development of good practice markers for the NSIP bridging practices database. Subsequently we have contributed evidence for New Horizons, the Marmot review of inequalities, and recent Department of Health guidance on public health.
Arguably RJA’s most ambitious project to date (and undertaken purely on a pro bono
basis), the enabling environments initiative seeks to find an over-



